Relationships

I teach and use in my private practice a healing modality called ThetaHealing®.  Among the many techniques in ThetaHealing is a way to clear DNA knowledge (whatever that is) you have shared with others.  In addition, we can use the method to bring back soul fragments that might have been given to or exchanged with other people.  This is particularly useful to do when someone is ending a relationship.  I have found that sometimes, many years after a person has legally divorced their partner, they still are energetically “married” to them.

We are cautioned to not do this DNA knowledge clearing if still in a relationship.  The result of doing so?  Well, one will go home and find they “don’t know” their partner anymore.  Their partner will “feel” like a stranger.  They will need to start over to build their historical knowledge base.

Recently, I’ve been studying another way of clearing limitations called Access Consciousness®.  In contrast to ThetaHealing, it is suggested by Access Consciousness teachers that you actual destroy and uncreate your relationships everyday.  Since I had studied ThetaHealing first and accepted their “rule” of not swiping clean the historical knowledge of current relationships, I was surprised by Access Consciousness having a completely opposite tenet.

Who is right?

First, there is no right or wrong way.  Each of the methods is designed to give a particular result.  The one to use is the one that matches your personal aims.

ThetaHealing will help maintain your relationship as smooth and predictable.  In a society where “living happily every after” and relationship longevity are valued, the idea of retaining historical knowledge of one’s partner is important. We rely on DNA knowledge to keep our relationships on “auto-pilot”.

ThetaHealing is truly a healing modality.  No strings attached.  The founder teaches people how to see more and change things through connection to source.  What you do with the tools is up to you.  The warning about not clearing DNA knowledge of your partner is based on people being unhappy with the result when they did it.  Most people do not want to have to reinvest the energy they spent learning about their partner.

Access Consciousness, in contrast, actually has more of an agenda for us.  Their tools are “designed to facilitate more consciousness for everyone”.  While Access Consciousness fails to give a clear and complete definition of consciousness they do claim, “Consciousness is the ability to continually awaken to more possibility, more choice and more life”.  They also state, “Consciousness includes everything and judges nothing®”.1  From these statements we can get the gist of what they mean by consciousness.

Access Consciousness encourages choice and free thinking.  Even though “destroying and uncreating your relationships” is a recommendation, one is advised to run it through your filters and decide if it is right for you.  Their recommendation is in alignment with the aim of increasing “consciousness”.

Being totally present is the keystone to “consciousness”.  In order to be present one needs to be in the present and not dwelling in history.  Relationship longevity is not the goal.  Being totally present in one’s relationships is the goal.  Since the “past is dead”, clearing it out everyday provides an opportunity to be totally present.  Having a fixed picture of our partner, ourselves,  or our relationships doesn’t allow as much potential for change as letting go of that picture each day.

REFERENCES
1.   Gary M. Douglas, Access Bars Manual, January 2015,  Access Consciousness, LLC, Houston, Texas.

2.  ThetaHealing

American Bad-Ass Survivalist

Thanks to my good friend that lent me her “American Bad-Ass Survival Guide” with bonus DVD “Lockpicking Secrets” I motivated to “break” into my crawl space this morning.  My crawl space is the most secure area of my home.

lock

One of two locks on my crawl space opening

It has two monster pad-locks on it that are even hard to open with the key.  (Of course, that was before I inadvertently threw the key away.)  The pad locks secure a metal covered piece of wood that covers the hole to the crawl space.  Why such security?  I don’t have an answer for that.  The crawl space houses two pet rabbits and even the copper pipe has been replaced by plastic alternatives.  Not much of value down there anymore.

While the lock-picking DVD did provide instruction on lock-picking, the method to open a pad lock is simpler and entails the use of a metal shim.  The metal shim is slid down into the area of the locking bar and causes the lock to simply open.  If you are interested, there is a nice wiki on how to make and use a metal shim.

After I made my shim and put them in position the lock still did not open.

hasp

Sawed opening to release lock from hasp

lockhammer

Using the hammer to release the second lock. Aluminum can shims at the top left.

I then remembered how hard these locks were to open even with the key.  I got out my bolt cutters, but, alas, they were too small.  Then I went for the hack-saw.  It seemed to only polish the shaft of the lock.  However, I realized that the metal the lock was attached to was vulnerable.  I sawed an opening in the metal hasp. (Does this mean I am still a bad-ass survivalist?  Or is this a cop out?)

My opening was just a little too small.  So I got the hammer out to free the lock from the hasp opening.  As I banged on the lock, it sprung open.  Damn!  What a wimpy lock after all.  I tried this out on the second lock.  After a couple bangs it too sprung open.

Interesting that this heavy, solid, hard lock was so easily opened.  And the opening occurred when my intention was not to open the lock, but to simply move it through the sawed opening.

Reflections/Clearings:  How many places am I trying to force something open or control a process when the opening could occur by changing my perspective or changing my focus?  Where have I defined something as hard, invulnerable or stuck within me when an alternative view is possible?  Am I willing to give up my personal view of “stuckness” and entertain the possibility that all aspects of myself are flowing and that creating greater flow may be as easy as continuing to turn the faucet head until the valve is completely open instead of interpreting the slow flow after just one turn as stuckness? RWGBPODPOCA9SBB

Something about this experience reminds me of some healing work I did yesterday with my friend, Marvin Knight.  During the session I realized that some of the things I had assumed were stuck were actually not….

Preliminary Dark Retreat

The retreat took some interesting turns.  First, just before the retreat began, I had a guest at my weekly Access Bars® trade offer to facilitate some breath work.  The first session was so amazing and fun I asked him to stay and join me in the dark and do some joint breath work.  We quickly transformed the house into a dark cave and the beginning of the retreat was focused on pranayama.  This was unexpected, but seemed like the right thing to do.

I ended up forty hours in the dark, with the last twenty-four hours alone in silence.  As is typical of any of my personal retreats, my experience ranged from sadness and despair to elation and inspiration.  I started the retreat not wanting to be on retreat and in the dark.  However, when I asked myself if I wanted to break retreat I found there was really no place else I wanted to be and nothing else I’d rather be doing.  I was simply experiencing sadness and dissatisfaction arising.   Nothing to do about that.

Later I would have moments of inspiration where I would think about ways to extend the retreat.  I was simply experiencing calm and confidence arising.  Nothing to do about that either.

This preliminary retreat was undertaken to see if it might help deepen my ability to stay in instant presence and inform a decision for a longer retreat.  The darkness did not change my ability to stay in instant presence significantly during the time I was in retreat.  However, this is not to say that a longer retreat might not give a different result or that some unnoticeable benefit occurred.  I did like the dark overall and would consider a longer retreat.

My friend that had done a three day dark retreat said that the first day or so is marked by increased sleep.  I expected this, yet found that my sleepiness was not increased beyond what I normally experience when meditating all day.  Indeed, after twenty-four hours, I was “tired” of practice and wanted to go to bed early, yet sleep would not come to me.  I did have a subtle sense that melatonin was increasing in my body, not by feeling sleepy, but by my body having an increased sense of heaviness.  I seemed to have a slight sense of headache, which may or may not have been related to changes due to the darkness.

Some of the logistical things I learned:

1)  During the retreat, my front window cracked, which I attribute to the heat generated by the inserts I used to darken the window.  Apparently the black plastic over a foam insert was too much.  The inner pane of the dual pane windows has a large crack in it now.

2)  Running the swamp cooler after dark was feasible since at night the attic vents that open when it runs did not allow in noticeable light.

3)  It is hard to maintain balance in the dark and even after forty hours this was not stabilized.  What this means, practically, was that walking and some of my chi gung moves didn’t really work.  I did find that by putting a quilt on the ground to mark my boundaries, I was able to do some “nine-palace walking” without running into things. Of course, even though I thought I was walking a pattern, my bearing and orientation were completely off.

4)  I would need to devote more attention to motivating to do physical exercise during the retreat.  The lack of ease of moving and difficulty doing my usual routine meant I did very little movement.  This, along with my extended sitting/lying, contributed to a slight flare up in my chronic back tension.

5)  After twenty-four hours the physical movement of switching positions (i.e. standing up) would stimulate the receptors in the eye and create a mosaic of light.  The optic nerve could also be stimulated directly by pressure on the eye.  The “light” would die out after a minute and then it would take about 10 minutes of rest before the phenomenon could be repeated.  Palpating the eye in a specific manner was one of the dark retreat practices.  I do not have a clear explanation of why it is done, but I did notice that the experience of “light” seemed to elevate my mood a little and make me feel more expansive.

I broke retreat by lighting a candle and slowly increasing the light from there.

I am still curious about doing a longer retreat, not because I am confident that it will facilitate instant presence, but because I am curious about the changes that occur with extended darkness.  My major concern is how to do that exploration and maintain balance.  During a daylight retreat I maintain balance with a couple hours of internal arts practice and a couple hours of reading of basic spiritual texts.  I have found that I don’t have the personal capacity for eleven hours (or even eight) hours of straight meditation for extended periods (I become depressed).  However, I can retreat successfully if these additional practices are included.

I think that if I were to repeat the dark retreat I would want a partner for the initial few days (or perhaps longer) with defined periods of silent practice and partner practice.  Although I have a little voice that says that this would be “breaking the rules” and in someways makes the whole retreat “invalid”, I remind myself we are encouraged to practice at our capacity and not beyond that.  Besides, what have I made so essential about being alone and being in silence?