Contemplation

The word contemplation, as used by the early Christian contemplatives such as St. John of the Cross, does not reflect our current dictionary definition:  1)  the action of looking thoughtfully at something for a long time, 2) deep reflective thought, 3) the state of being thought about or planned.

When we talk about contemplation in the modern sense we are referring to an active process.  When we contemplate something we are engaged in an active process of either thinking about something or being in the presence of something and engaging with it with some of our other senses besides intellect.  This is completely different than the understanding of St. John of the Cross or St. Teresa of Avila as we shall see later in this post.

I was introduced to Christian Contemplation via Bernadette Roberts.  I had a good foundation in the Buddhist path to enlightenment and was excited to learn of an account of a woman that had reached enlightenment using a Christian Contemplative approach.  I was not very successful with reaching Shamata (calm abiding), a level of meditation considered necessary for Vipassana (insight), so I wanted to find out exactly what she did with hopes that it might be more suitable for me.

I approached my studies of Christian Contemplation with the hopes of learning exactly what they did so I could incorporate it into my spiritual practice.  I first ran into Father’s Keating course on centering prayer and took that.  It seemed exactly like meditation to me.  This was both a let-down and a validation.  I was hoping that I could find a path to enlightenment that didn’t require meditation, but I was also pleased that the Christians had found the same practice essential.

Centering Prayer, in practice, is very much like the objectless meditation my meditation teacher had prescribed for me just the year before.  The only difference I could find was that in meditation one has the expectation that the mind will become stable and can be “trained” through repetition and persistence, while the contemplatives believe that reaching higher levels of “prayer” is dependent on God’s grace.  I found the idea of grace exactly what I needed to take the pressure off.

The instruction that Father Keating gives for Centering Prayer is to open oneself to awareness and the action of God.  To practice, you pick a one syllable word (your sacred word) that will be used to affirm you intention of being open to the action and presence of God, then whenever your mind drifts, and you become aware of your drifting, you silently say your word and center yourself again in your receptive state.

Father Keating explains that at first you may find yourself drifting over and over and hence saying your word over and over.  He says that sometimes people fall asleep – “who knows how God will choose to act/commune with you”.  What I really appreciated about Father Keating’s presentation is that he talked a little about the process of purgation, although I do not recall him using that term.  He talked of being “taken over” by some arising where you really had no control over the process and would get caught up in it, then it would pass and you could come back to the sweetness of God.  He said that this would repeat over and over.  Although both Christian Contemplatives and Buddhist Meditators talk about purification, I’d never heard anyone really describe the process.  Now I recognize this as one of the most severe deficiencies in the training I’d received.

After studying Father Keating, I went on to read St. John of the Cross (The Ascent and the Dark Night) as well as St. Teresa of Avila (The Way of Perfection and Interior Castle).  However, I was still reading them from the point of view of the Buddhist path to enlightenment and Father Keating’s Centering Prayer.  Then I met Shawn Ellison at a Bernadette Robert’s Retreat.

Shawn began his contemplative path when he was 15years old.  After two years of dry practice he had his first experience of God (aka experience of no-self).  When he turned 21 he entered the unitive stage.  The unitive stage is characterized by continuous presence of God and all actions being motivated by the Holy Spirit.  It can be described as being one with God and is a preliminary stage before reaching enlightenment or the permanent state of no-self.

He told me that he knew nothing of meditation when he started.  His initial practice was simply praying to know God, studying scripture, and the morality that goes with dedicating oneself to a spiritual life.  He reached the pivotal experience of no-self without meditation.  This intrigued me.  I wanted to know exactly what he did, so I could replicated it.

In subsequent conversations he has summarized his complete practice as a beginner and as a proficient as loving God.  He says that Father Keating’s teaching is a modernization that is not founded in the Christian Contemplative Tradition and he doesn’t believe it will lead to realization of oneness with God.  Now this was intriguing.  I couldn’t really see anything different from what he was saying happened to him and the Centering Prayer Method.

I went back and reread St. John of the Cross with the intent of really opening myself to the possibility that meditation was not necessary.  I kept translating contemplation as meditation or at least stillness.  It seemed to me that contemplation was calm abiding or shamata.  Indeed, by our modern definitions it is the same as meditation.  However, here is the actual definition that St. John of the Cross uses for Contemplation:

The communion of God untied to the senses, or the particular, received passively by the spirit in an attitude of faith and love, of general loving attention.  Also called Mystical Theology.  May be referred to as infused because the soul receives it passively, just as one receives sunlight by doing no more than opening the shutters.

 

In accordance with its functions or effects, the adjectives purgative, illuminative, and unitive are used; the prevalence of some effects over others is what determines the use of these adjectives.

 

Its signs are:  an inability to practice discursive prayer and meditation, a disinclination to fix the imagination on other things; the desire to remain alone in loving awareness of God without particular considerations; or in this latter case, when the contemplation is purgative, a solicitous and painful care about serving God and not turning back despite feelings of aversion or dryness in the things of God.

The key point that St. John of the Cross emphasizes is that it is a passive process.  Both Centering Prayer and meditation are active processes.  So this means that contemplation is neither of those.  Further, contemplation is actually something that can occur “off the cushion” or outside of our prayer and meditation practice.

Contemplation is a passive “communion with God that is untied to the senses”.  St. John of the Cross would call this an interior communion.  I would translate this into modern language to mean it is taking place at the subconscious level.  If it is “untied to the senses” then it would be something we cannot detect consciously as we would be unable to sense it.  The communion with God is only detected by the effects of it.

St. John of the Cross kindly gives us the most clear effects of God bringing us into contemplation.  The first is an inability to pray and meditate as we used to.  Second, we are not interested in worldly things either.  Third we are just wanting to “be” with God.  Finally, if the contemplation is purgative we may be feeling horrible, but we are concerned primarily with our relationship to God.

The burning question I am left with is, “How do I get to contemplation?”

Now, even though perfect contemplation is the goal, we already know that it only happens passively.  However, St. John of the Cross does describe what we can do to reach contemplation.  Contemplation is part of the passive dark night of the soul and he talks extensively about the active dark night of the soul in The Ascent of Mount Carmel.

Not surprising, the main components of the active night are renunciation and morality.  He goes into great deal about how to detach oneself from created things and especially warns of divesting ourselves of the visions and the like that can arise spontaneously.  St. Teresa of Avila gives more detail on the discursive prayer and meditation that is suitable for making oneself a vessel for perfect contemplation.  Her treatise emphases, as my friend Shawn does also, that love and devotion for God is paramount.

From a purely historical perspective, what we think of as meditation and centering prayer are not components of the Christian Contemplative Path.  The desire for God (what we might call the desire for enlightenment) could be seen as the driving force with a total faith that God will lead one by the best path possible.

Centering Prayer and meditation may be important tools for realization (My meditation teacher says “go ahead and rely on grace for realization, but keep meditating to increase your odds.”), however, it seems that renunciation, morality and devotion are the universal essentials.

Leveraging the Media

In my Pharmacology of Addiction class we recently studied the history of inhalant use.  Before 1959 there was no media mention of sniffing glue.  That year a report of several children in Arizona and Colorado being arrested for intoxication from smelling glue was made in the Denver Post.  This article included detailed information on how the glue was inhaled and the effects.

Within the next year Denver police, who had never heard of deliberate glue inhalation, had investigated around 50 cases.  By 1961, they were seeing 30 cases a month of glue sniffing and that year they arrested 278 people.  The publicity of the media, and the dire warnings they were broadcasting, had the effect of increasing curiosity and the spread of the glue inhalation trend.  Indeed, by 1962 the Hobby Industry Association of America invested $250,000 to combat the spread of glue sniffing.  This of course did not slow down the trend.

Now, why can’t we do this with meditation?  Certainly tales of the mind and body bliss experienced in the jhanas should be sufficient to lure people into meditative concentration.  The ancient masters of China used this technique to obtain internal art students.  Demonstrations of great power and the promise of secret techniques are always sure to hook people.

Yet, I never hear people talking about the absolute blissful states that can be obtained in meditation.  Perhaps this is because people dedicated to the path see the bliss as a consolation, but not really anything to lust after.  However, I’d much rather see people approaching meditation with wrong motivation than going after an addictive drug with the same motivation.  The truth is the practice will weed out people with wrong motivation and/or convert people to truly seeking a spiritual lifestyle.

Indeed, most meditation instructions fail to really discuss the stages of meditation.  People begin to meditate without having a clear vision of what they are doing, how the practice changes the mind, and at what stage they can expect bliss to arise.  I know that I decided to meditate because it was part of the Twelve Steps.  I continued to do it because it was part of the Noble Eightfold Path as well as Tibetan Lam Rims.

I think we are seeing this with Yoga.  In record numbers people are practicing yoga and most of them have no idea what they are doing.  Actually they know what they are doing, but it is not the original intention of the practice.

In Tibetan Buddhism, yoga is a secret teaching.  After 20-25 years of study one graduates from the open or sutra teachings and then is taught yoga and other secret subjects in small private classes.  Now, we have people practicing these deep methods with rarely a clue to what they can really do.  I love it!  Certainly, meditation is similar.  Many people start doing it, like me, without really a clue to why or what.  I only knew it was something good for me.  Perhaps we can be more vocal about the bliss in order to attract more people?

REFERENCES
McKim, W.A. (2007). Drugs and Behavior: An Introduction to Behavioral Pharmacology. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Suffering over Suffering

My experience with thought addiction came a couple months ago.  I had been wanting to write about it, but I was waiting for something more.  That something more showed up a couple nights ago.

I am in the process of looking for a new roommate and a couple of men that had just landed in our state from Ohio needed a room.  They weren’t what I was looking for, but I’ve had good experiences with very short term rentals so I offered them the room for a couple of days.  Everything was fine and then this massive fan showed up.  Jon said he had some nasal problem and the only thing that gave him relief was blowing air.  Sure, no problem.

But it was.  I am used to a quiet environment and that fan was very noisy.  It was like a jet engine.   I noticed my mind begin to become agitated as I thought of reasons it was a problem:  “I can’t relax with that constant noise”, “He doesn’t really need it”, “People that use fans are ______ (stupid, intolerant, disillusioned, weak, etc)”, “Fans make nasal conditions worse”, “I am an expert on fans”, “He needs nettles”.  The thoughts were unending.  I am a very intelligent and creative thinker and I can come up with all the angles on why the fan was unnecessary and bad.

At first I decided that the problem was really all in my mind.  Clearly, if my mind wasn’t reacting with aversion to the fan and craving for silence then I wouldn’t be having a problem at all.  I was able to get a hold of the thoughts arising and not engage with them. I know from experience that when you stop engaging with the thoughts and believing them then the subconscious figures out that the thoughts are not needed.  My agitation diminished.

I was then able to decide what I wanted to do.  With further investigation I realized that I really did have a “reaction” to the fan and the constant noise that was biologically true and not just a patterned mental response.  It did agitate me even without the additional thoughts.  Originally my house guests had requested to stay a week, but I decided that I couldn’t last that long.  I decided that four days would work for me.  This would honor both my desire to help them and my desire to respect my body.

As it turned out, I got even further relief when they kept their door close.  I had assumed they needed the door open to allow fresh air circulation.  That turned out not to be the case.  This reminds me of the importance of clearly expressing my problem and allowing other solutions to present themselves. Since I was able to tell them what I was struggling with, they were able to come up with a solution that partially remedied my problem.

My physical reaction to fan noise is my “suffering”.  The habitual thought patterns that arose from that suffering had the potential to induce a far greater suffering than the original reaction.  It is the habitual thought patterns that we have a choice over.  I’ve hear say that “pain is inevitable but suffering is optional”.  I used to be the worse at suffering over my suffering.  I wonder how my friends endured my endless complaints.  Having freedom from the optional suffering is refreshing.  I love my life now.

I also would be amiss to not point out that even the pain goes away as we progress on the path to enlightenment.  Long term, the pain is optional too.